Gram vs Render ETFs & ETPs — Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Gram and Render ETFs and ETPs.

This compares the tracked product sets, not the investment merits of the two cryptocurrencies. Known AUM is summed by product, average fees are unweighted, and provider leadership is based on the sum of its products’ known AUM. Different coverage and collection dates limit comparisons.

Latest collection in this selection: 2026-10-07 04:40:57 UTC. Collection time is not the issuer's valuation date. AUM and estimated flows use available USD values; totals can be incomplete. Average fees are unweighted and include reported zero fees.

Metric Gram Render
Total AUM $15.20M $7.74M
ETF Count 3 3
Average Fee 1.47% 2.10%
Top Provider 21Shares 21Shares
Net Flow 1D +$0 +$0
Net Flow 7D +$0 +$0
Net Flow 30D +$0 +$0

Gram ETFs & ETPs

Ticker Name AUM Fee Flow 1D
GRAM 21shares Gram Staking ETP $12.85M 2.50% +$0
CTON CoinShares Toncoin Staking ETP $1.67M 0.00% -
VALOUR GRAM (GRAM) SEK Valour Gram SEK $684K 1.90% -

Render ETFs & ETPs

Ticker Name AUM Fee Flow 1D
RNDR 21shares Render ETP $4.12M 2.50% +$0
VALOUR RNDR SEK Valour Render SEK $3.57M 1.90% -
VALOUR RENDER Valour Render $44K 1.90% -

Questions about this selection

Which has more ETFs and ETPs, Gram or Render?

Gram has 3 ETFs and ETPs vs 3 for Render.

Which has higher total AUM, Gram or Render?

Gram ETFs and ETPs hold $15.20M vs Render's $7.74M.

Which has lower average fees, Gram or Render?

Gram ETFs and ETPs average 1.47% vs Render's 2.10%.